I only wonder what makes people go into frenzy calling porn visual prostitution. If the pen with its null material impact can be mightier than the sword, then why porn cannot be visual prostitution.
There is a clear cut answer to this. It is that porn is made for men. For it is made for men already justifies its sanctified existence. To this all its grossness is absolved. Yet on the contrary a sensual piece of art is potent enough to arose the ire of the cultured world, tribes with scantily clad women are uncultured,more so a religion with the dominance of feminity and nudism is subjected sheer criticism for no other reason than that it embodies the spirit of the feminine.
Another irony that runs here is that
all porn actresses are to be condemned but all the porn enjoyers are legally and morally authorized to malign porn actresses because the latter are mostly men who are saints. It is their saintliness which make them acquainted with the world of the unseen, with their mere inner vision they know all acts of Mia Khalifa and Sasha Gray which naturally authorize them to view these women through the lens of morality whereas their own morality stay intact as they were only having divine visions in their meditative state.
These holy men are men of all sorts, young men, old man, married men, unmarried men, single men, committed men, monogamous men, polygamous men and so on. Irrespective of their status and age they indulge in the holiest act of making endeavours for achieving divine visions. Keeping in mind the sanctity of their actions faithfulness is nothing beyond archaic morality whereas for a female to indulge in such acts are absolute taboo and should not go unjudged as this is an anomaly to her authentic nature.
For she is the ultimate receptor her function is to receive without questioning and opposing. Beyond that she is a mere progenitor and appeaser of men; for she herself she neither has her own opinions, nor desire.